Comments | Page 22
Comments
The Federation of Law Societies of Canada and Online Teaching
Like many Canadian law faculties, the University of Ottawa has been delivering a significant amount of its teaching virtually or bi-modally during the COVID-19 pandemic. I have been teaching administrative law in a flipped classroom format for the last two years: students consume recorded lectures beforehand and participate via Zoom in small- and large-group class […] Read more
Comments
Exam Season
Teaching term is over and exam season is upon us. Here is this year’s exam for Administrative Law. You have six hours… In the fictional Canadian province of Lower Canada, there occurred in 2020 an outbreak of a highly contagious and extremely dangerous flu-like disease known as VICOD. In Lower Canada, the Public Health Act […] Read more
Comments
Early Canadian Administrative Law
The few historically oriented discussions of public administration in Canada tend to take the regulation of railways in the 1850s as their starting point. But there were early pre-cursors to the administrative state. The dominant theory of Canadian economic development is that the country was built on the production and export of various ‘staples’. From […] Read more
Comments
The Rise of Facts in Public Law I: Factual Assessments in Judicial Review of Administrative Action
In a draft book chapter I am working on with co-author Kseniya Kudischeva, we discuss the increased importance of factual assessments in public law. Here is the first of four substantive parts. Comments and thoughts welcome. Common law judges have traditionally been highly reluctant to interfere with factual assessments made by administrative decision-makers. This reluctance […] Read more
Comments
Prerogative, Justiciability, Remedy: Acadian Society of New Brunswick v Canada (Prime Minister), 2022 NBQB 55
The remarkable decision in Acadian Society of New Brunswick v Canada (Prime Minister), 2022 NBQB 55 deserves comment, especially for its treatment of justiciability and remedy. Here, DeWare CJ declared that the appointment of a unilingual Anglophone Lieutenant-Governor for the bilingual province of New Brunswick was unconstitutional as it violated a variety of New-Brunswick-specific provisions […] Read more
Comments
Restitution and Reasonableness Review: Ontario Addiction Treatment Centres v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 393
The application of the principles of restitution/unjust enrichment to overpayments of tax in Canada is in a muddled state. The problem arises where a taxpayer overpays on the basis of a mistake of law or a mistake of fact, a capacious set of categories which can include mistakes about the lawfulness or applicability of a […] Read more
Comments
Recordings from the Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium 2022, “Artificial Administration: Automation, Digitization and Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration”
With thanks again to the speakers, the hundreds of participants and my partners (the Centre for Law, Technology and Society, the Centre for Public Law and the Centre on Governance), here are the recordings of this year’s Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium on the theme of “Artificial Administration”. Catherine Sharkey, “Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence […] Read more
Comments
Certified Questions, References and Reasonableness: Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Galindo Camayo, 2022 FCA 50
In my post on “Unreasonable Bilingual Interpretations of Law“, I mentioned that the Supreme Court would have the opportunity in Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Mason, 2021 FCA 156 (leave granted) to say more about the methodology of reviewing administrative interpretations of law. Mason raises other issues as well, one of which also arose in […] Read more
Comments
Materiality and Morality: MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17
In its decision in MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17, the High Court of Australia ventured once again into the murky territory of materiality in administrative law (a topic I address in detail in this paper). The issue in this case was who bears the onus of establishing materiality, the […] Read more
Comments
Unreasonable Bilingual Interpretations of Law: Bureau de la sécurité privée c. Aurélien, 2022 QCCA 239
In “One Year of Vavilov“, I observed that “some portions of Vavilov are liable to become battlegrounds between different factions of judges, those who favour more intrusive review on questions of law in one camp, their more deferential colleagues in the other” (at p. 15). One of those portions is the one on judicial review […] Read more