fundamental rights
An Unsafe Harbour: Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, C‑362/14
Last week’s decision of the European Court of Justice in Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, C-362/14 deemed invalid an important self-certification regime for companies transferring personal data to the United States from the European Union. Several aspects of the decision are of general interest. Schrems is an Austrian student who, like most of us, has […] Read more
Some Recent Scholarly Work on Doré v. Barreau du Québec
I have a long-standing interest in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Doré v. Barreau du Québec, [2012] 1 SCR 395, 2012 SCC 12, in which the Court endorsed a deferential approach to administrative decisions infringing fundamental rights. See this paper, for example. One of the most intriguing issues post-Doré is what the Court […] Read more
Liberty, Vires and Fairness: the UKSC Decision on Workfare
The UK government has established a variety of schemes with the goal of returning welfare recipients to the workforce. Some require claimants to work in return for benefits. R. (Reilly) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, [2013] UKSC 68 addresses the legality of two of these “workfare” schemes. Of particular interest, given the […] Read more
Prescribing Greater Protection for Rights: Administrative Law and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
My paper for this Saturday’s conference at the University of Ottawa in honour of Justice Charron is now available on SSRN. You can download it here. To whet your appetite, here is the abstract: In interpreting the “prescribed by law” requirement contained in section 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian courts have […] Read more