I have posted “Constitutionally Conforming Interpretation in Canada” to SSRN. Here is the abstract: The presumption of constitutionally conforming interpretation is an important part of Canadian constitutional law. But that there is fundamental disagreement about the presumption. This fundamental disagreement reveals the existence of two different camps of lawyers, which I label Type A and […] Read more

In its landmark decision in the Case of Prorogations, the United Kingdom Supreme Court suggested that the unlawfulness of Prime Minister Johnson’s advice to the Queen rendered it — and the prorogation that followed — a nullity. Together with the UKSC’s earlier decision in the unusual case of Ahmed (No. 2), the Case of Prorogations […] Read more

In a few minutes, Novak Djokovic’s challenge to the validity of the decision to cancel his visa is going to get underway before Australia’s federal court. You can access the court materials here. The live stream will be here. I do not think Djokovic is likely to win this case. He bears the onus to […] Read more

There is an interesting piece today in the Globe and Mail — Canada’s paper of record — about fundamental disagreement between the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada about the interpretation of the Charter. The nine judges are “more divided than ever” on fundamental legal questions. There is certainly a divide there, but it […] Read more