Comments | Page 38
Comments
Explaining the Growth of Judicial Review
Over at the United Kingdom Constitutional Law Association blog, I have written a post about my forthcoming article on the “Culture of Justification” in administrative law, penned in response to a recent post by Professor Jason Varuhas. As he observes, the procedural and substantive law of judicial review has changed greatly in recent decades, a […] Read more
Comments
Webinars and Some Thoughts on What Will Change and What Will Stay the Same
Predicting the long-term consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic has become a cottage industry. It is also something of a fool’s errand as the medium- to long-term outcomes depend in large part on how many waves of COVID-19 sweep over us and how bad the effects are. Nonetheless, for what little they are worth, let me […] Read more
Comments
Making Sense of the Making Available Right: Entertainment Software Assoc. v. Society Composers, 2020 FCA 100 (Webinar, June 23, 2pm EST)
With the support of the Centre for Law, Technology and Society I will be moderating a discussion of the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision in Entertainment Software Assoc. v. Society Composers, 2020 FCA 100, a case at the intersection of copyright law and administrative law. I will be joined by Carys J. Craig (Osgoode […] Read more
Comments
Leading Works in Public Law: de Smith’s Judicial Review of Administrative Action — “The Significance”
I am currently working on a chapter for “Leading Works in Public Law”, a collection edited by Ben Yong and Patrick O’Brien. My chapter is on SA de Smith’s Judicial Review of Administrative Action. Here is a draft of the third section, on “The Significance” The Significance Judicial Review of Administrative Action was “the first […] Read more
Comments
Vavilov and the Culture of Justification in Contemporary Administrative Law
Although this year’s Osgoode Constitutional Cases Conference was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the annual issue of the Supreme Court Law Review containing papers from the Conference is going ahead. My paper is entitled “Vavilov and the Culture of Justification in Contemporary Administrative Law“. Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision […] Read more
Comments
Dear Administrative (An)Nihilists … A West Coast rejoinder from Mary Liston, Cristie Ford and Alexandra Flynn
Recently, Mark Mancini and Léonid Sirota at Double Aspect took issue with the arguments we made in our posts on the Vavilov decision which Paul Daly had kindly published at Administrative Law Matters. Paul has since generously offered us space to respond. We aim to keep our rejoinder short and spicy, but we also want […] Read more
Comments
Leading Works in Public Law: de Smith’s Judicial Review of Administrative Action — “The Context”
I am currently working on a chapter for “Leading Works in Public Law”, a collection edited by Ben Yong and Patrick O’Brien. My chapter is on SA de Smith’s Judicial Review of Administrative Action. Here is a draft of the second section, on “The Context” The Context As noted, Judicial Review of Administrative Action began […] Read more
Comments
Governmental Power and COVID-19: The Limits of Judicial Review
I have posted “Governmental Power and COVID-19: The Limits of Judicial Review” to SSRN. Here is the abstract: The goal of this Chapter is to explain why those hoping for a high level of judicial engagement with the forms of power being used to combat the cultural, economic, medical, social and other fallout from the […] Read more
Comments
Broad Regulations on Narrow Statutory Bases: The First Nations Election Cancellation and Postponement Regulations (Prevention of Diseases) SOR/2020-84
One of the questions from the audience at last week’s Centre for Constitutional Studies Webinar on Emergency Powers and Legal Principle (accessible free of charge here) was about the legality of the First Nations Election Cancellation and Postponement Regulations (Prevention of Diseases), SOR/2020-84. Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Regulations provide in respect of […] Read more
Comments
Doré and Vavilov, A Surreply
Mark Mancini has posted a reply to my response to the paper in which he argues that Doré and Vavilov cannot be or are difficult to reconciled. I suppose this, then, is a surreply (civil procedure mavens should feel free to correct my terminology and hyphenation). I think Mancini shifts the goalposts in his reply […] Read more