Comments | Page 52
Comments
Hamlet without the Prince: Re Buick’s Application [2018] NICA 26
Paul Daly September 24, 2018
Under the “Carltona principle”, decisions taken in reality by civil servants in a government department are treated in law as decisions of the responsible minister, such that where a statute provides for decisions to be made by a “minister” it is lawful for a civil servant to take them in the minister’s stead (see here […] Read more
Comments
Sean Rehaag on Revisiting the Luck of the Draw
Paul Daly September 21, 2018
Back in 2012 I posted about a paper by Sean Rehaag which identified “wild variations in the treatment of leave and judicial review applications by different Federal Court judges”. Reforms to the leave and judicial review process followed. Professor Rehaag has now returned with a new study, “Revisiting the Luck of the Draw“, covering an […] Read more
Comments
Summer Reading IV: Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw (Nicholas Parrillo ed.)
Paul Daly September 17, 2018
A full review of this book will appear in the November issue of the Cambridge Law Journal Administrative law aficionados often find themselves asking existential questions. Should administrative lawyers focus on judicial review – the control by the ordinary courts of administrative action – or should they focus on the internal workings of the administration? […] Read more
Comments
Summer Reading III: The Shaping of EU Competition Law (Cambridge University Press, 2018) by Pablo Ibanez Colomo
Paul Daly September 14, 2018
I was in London today at a Chillin’ Competition event at the London School of Economics to mark the publication of The Shaping of EU Competition Law by Pablo Ibanez Colomo, where I commented on the administrative law matters raised by the book. As you will see, I think this is an important piece of […] Read more
Comments
Channeling or Excluding Judicial Review of Administrative Action
Paul Daly September 12, 2018
Two recent cases, one from Canada and one from New Zealand, suggest that a useful distinction can be made between excluding and channeling judicial review of administrative action. Legislatures often interfere with the supervisory jurisdiction of the superior courts, sometimes to eliminate it altogether (excluding), but more often to regulate it, for instance by imposing […] Read more
Comments
Summer Reading II: Complexity’s Embrace: the International Law Implications of Brexit (Oonagh E. Fitzgerald and Eva Lein (eds))
Paul Daly September 11, 2018
A full review of this book will appear in the November issue of the International Journal As I write, in the summer of 2018, there is tremendous noise in British politics: cries of frustration from those opposed to the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union; howls of outrage from those who fear Brexit will […] Read more
Comments
Summer Reading I: Sossin & Lawrence, Administrative Law in Practice: Principles and Advocacy
Paul Daly September 7, 2018
As I am slowly getting back to work after the summer break, I thought it might be useful to share with readers some of the books I have been reading over the holidays. Lorne Sossin and Emily Lawrence have produced a very useful text, Administrative Law in Practice: Principles and Advocacy. As the authors describe […] Read more
Comments
Ontario Bar Association Annual Update on Judicial Review: Toronto, September 26
Paul Daly August 31, 2018
Justice David Stratas and I will step once more unto the breach on September 26 in Toronto to discuss recent developments in Canadian administrative law (and, where relevant, developments elsewhere in the common law world). You will find details on how to register (in person or via webcast) here. We hope you can join us! […] Read more
Comments
Judicial Review, Proportionality and Appellate Standards: R(AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] UKSC 47
What should an appellate court do in an appeal from an application of the proportionality test by a lower court? In his judgment for a unanimous UK Supreme Court in R (AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] UKSC 48, Lord Carnwath concluded that the appellate court need not conduct the proportionality analysis […] Read more
Comments
The Scope of Judicial Review in Ireland: O’Connell v The Turf Club [2015] IESC 57; [2017] 2 I.R. 43
Following up on last week’s post on the public/private divide in Irish law and, indeed, last month’s post on the scope of judicial review in Canada, readers may be interested in the most recent treatment by the Irish Supreme Court of the scope of judicial review, to be found in the fascinating case of O’Connell […] Read more