Here are two contrasting Court of Appeal decisions relating to human rights decision-makers’ ability to hear late-filed complaints: British Columbia (Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General) v. Mzite, 2014 BCCA 220 and Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2014 NSCA 18. In the latter, the decision-maker proceeded pursuant to […] Read more

I have a new essay on SSRN, “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach“, prepared for the inaugural Public Law Conference at the University of Cambridge later this year. This is the latest in a series of mini-posts. Download the whole essay here. Substantive Review In many jurisdictions it is now accepted that where an administrative decision-maker […] Read more

A well-written student note takes me to task for my interpretation of Catalyst Paper Corp. v. North Cowichan (District), [2012] 1 SCR 5. Catalyst has not (yet) proved to be catalytic. It has not been applied to delegated legislation or decisions taken by other elected bodies. I unhesitatingly concede that Canadian courts have treated Catalyst […] Read more

I have a new essay on SSRN, “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach“, prepared for the inaugural Public Law Conference at the University of Cambridge later this year. This is the latest in a series of mini-posts. Download the whole essay here. Procedural Fairness It has long been understood that the rules of procedural fairness vary […] Read more

The legality of the appointment of Mainville J.A. to the Quebec Court of Appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal has been challenged. Several jurists have weighed in on the question: Hugo Cyr, Maxime St-Hilaire and Robert Décary* all take the view that a federal court judge cannot lawfully be appointed to a Quebec Court […] Read more

I have a new essay on SSRN, “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach“, prepared for the inaugural Public Law Conference at the University of Cambridge later this year. This is the latest in a series of mini-posts. Download the whole essay here. Institutional Review: Bias[1] Different jurisdictions formulate the test for impartiality differently, but as a […] Read more

I have a short paper on SSRN on the gun registry case that will be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Fall. Here is the abstract: Section 29 of the Ending the Long-Gun Registry Act orders federal and provincial officials to destroy gun-registration records collected collaboratively over a period of two decades. […] Read more

Last week’s Federal Court ruling in Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care v. Canada, 2014 FC 651 that cuts to refugee healthcare were “cruel and unusual” punishment [ed: treatment, not punishment] that violated the Charter has understandably created a great deal of noise. The case will go on appeal, possibly to the Supreme Court of Canada. […] Read more

Canada has a new anti-spam law. Sending commercial electronic communications without the recipient’s consent is no longer permitted. But “commercial activity” is very broadly defined: “any particular transaction, act or conduct or any regular course of conduct that is of a commercial character, whether or not the person who carries it out does so in […] Read more

Adrian Vermeule and Cass Sunstein have an intriguing new paper on Libertarian Administrative Law: In recent years, several judges on the nation’s most important regulatory court — the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — have given birth to libertarian administrative law, in the form of a series of judge-made […] Read more