2018
Comments
Summer Reading II: Complexity’s Embrace: the International Law Implications of Brexit (Oonagh E. Fitzgerald and Eva Lein (eds))
Paul Daly September 11, 2018
A full review of this book will appear in the November issue of the International Journal As I write, in the summer of 2018, there is tremendous noise in British politics: cries of frustration from those opposed to the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union; howls of outrage from those who fear Brexit will […] Read more
Comments
Summer Reading I: Sossin & Lawrence, Administrative Law in Practice: Principles and Advocacy
Paul Daly September 7, 2018
As I am slowly getting back to work after the summer break, I thought it might be useful to share with readers some of the books I have been reading over the holidays. Lorne Sossin and Emily Lawrence have produced a very useful text, Administrative Law in Practice: Principles and Advocacy. As the authors describe […] Read more
Comments
Ontario Bar Association Annual Update on Judicial Review: Toronto, September 26
Paul Daly August 31, 2018
Justice David Stratas and I will step once more unto the breach on September 26 in Toronto to discuss recent developments in Canadian administrative law (and, where relevant, developments elsewhere in the common law world). You will find details on how to register (in person or via webcast) here. We hope you can join us! […] Read more
Comments
Judicial Review, Proportionality and Appellate Standards: R(AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] UKSC 47
What should an appellate court do in an appeal from an application of the proportionality test by a lower court? In his judgment for a unanimous UK Supreme Court in R (AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] UKSC 48, Lord Carnwath concluded that the appellate court need not conduct the proportionality analysis […] Read more
Comments
The Scope of Judicial Review in Ireland: O’Connell v The Turf Club [2015] IESC 57; [2017] 2 I.R. 43
Following up on last week’s post on the public/private divide in Irish law and, indeed, last month’s post on the scope of judicial review in Canada, readers may be interested in the most recent treatment by the Irish Supreme Court of the scope of judicial review, to be found in the fascinating case of O’Connell […] Read more
Comments
Effective Administrative Appeals (Again): Re X, 2017 CanLII 33034 (CA IRB)
In Re X, 2017 CanLII 33034 (CA IRB), an important case I missed when it was decided last year, the Refugee Appeal Division of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board sat as a three-member panel with a view to setting out general rules as to how the RAD should deal with appeals from the (first-instance) Refugee […] Read more
Comments
What Public/Private Divide? The Scope of Judicial Review in Ireland
I have been working on the “Scope of Judicial Review” chapter of Administrative Law in Ireland. There has been some controversy in recent times about the use of judicial review principles in a private law setting (see Varuhas and Lim & Chan). But in Ireland, as you will see from the extracts below, it is […] Read more
Comments
Parole: Law, Policy and Practice
I spoke today at a conference on Parole: Law, Policy and Practice, organised by the Cambridge Centre for Criminal Justice, at which I commented on the recent decision of the Divisional Court in R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin). This was a judicial review of the Board’s decision to direct […] Read more
Comments
A Week of Arguments about Deference
Last week’s output from the Supreme Court of Canada featured four administrative law cases: one about the analytical tools used by the Correctional Service of Canada for dealing with aboriginal offenders (Ewert v. Canada, 2018 SCC 30); one about the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s refusal to entertain discrimination claims brought by members of Indigenous communities […] Read more
Comments
Does Haralambous Tell us Anything About Privacy International?
The UK Supreme Court will hear the Privacy International case in December 2018. I posted on the Court of Appeal decision here. One of the concerns the Court of Appeal had related to the extent to which sensitive material might leak into the public domain if the Investigatory Powers Tribunal is subject to judicial review.The […] Read more