Comments | Page 62

Comments

New Paper: Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Cases on Standard of Review and Reasonableness

I have a new paper on Canadian administrative law, to be published shortly in the McGill Law Journal, entitled “Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Cases on Standard of Review and Reasonableness“. It is likely to be topical, in view of recent developments: the discussion in Wilson and the extra-judicial plea by Justice David Stratas for “doctrinal coherence […] Read more

Comments

Explaining Numbers: Two Recent Cases

Apologies again for the long silence. Things remain rather chaotic, as we find ourselves between Canada and Cambridge, a move made all the more difficult by Brexit, and I have several writing commitments which have been filling my limited free time. These are now much closer to being fulfilled (or, at least, the deadlines are […] Read more

Comments

Guest Post, Sébastien Grammond: Can Parliament enact a requirement that Supreme Court judges be bilingual?

One could be forgiven for thinking that the Supreme Court settled this question definitively in the following quote from the Reference re Supreme Court Act : Both the general eligibility requirements for appointment and the specific eligibility requirements for appointment from Quebec are aspects of the composition of the Court.  It follows that any substantive change […] Read more

Comments

Doctoring Statistics: C.S.B -v- The Minister for Social Protection, [2016] IECA 116

I have posted before on unsuccessful efforts, in Australia and Canada, to invoke statistical evidence in order to demonstrate bias on the part of an administrative decision-maker. In the Australian and Canadian scenarios, the claims of bias were based on evidence showing that immigration officials invariably rejected asylum applications. An interesting recent Irish case, C.S.B […] Read more