Comments | Page 63
Comments
New Job: University of Cambridge
I am really delighted to say that from October 1, I will be a Senior Lecturer in Public Law at the University of Cambridge. I have been hired to teach administrative law; the position opened up because of the impending retirement (from his university position only) of Professor Christopher Forsyth. There are very few places […] Read more
Comments
Procedure, Substance, Deference: Netflix, Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2015 FCA 289
Netflix, Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2015 FCA 289 is a useful illustration of some of the problems caused by judicial intervention on an intrusive standard on procedural matters. At issue was a tariff certified by the Copyright Board that imposed a monthly minimal fee for free trial periods […] Read more
Comments
Some More Thoughts on the TWU Litigation
I have been following, via Trinity Western University School of Law’s invaluable Twitter feed, proceedings at the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal: I posted on the first-instance decision here. The questions from the bench on Day One did not augur particularly well for the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, but the judges have also probed the […] Read more
Comments
Diplomatic Immunity Squared: Al-Juffali v. Estrada, [2016] EWCA Civ 176
There are several recent English decisions on an interesting question: to what extent can courts adjudicating private law disputes look behind official credentials and determine whether diplomatic immunity applies? The basic issues are outlined well by Philippa Webb in this post on EJIL: Talk! In both cases, as Dr. Webb explains, several facts suggest that […] Read more
Comments
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Public Law: Some Thoughts
Blogging has been slow recently, as you have doubtless noticed. We are coming up to the end of term here in Montreal, so the administrative load has been heavier than usual, and I have also completed a report for a government department on the functioning of an administrative agency (about which I will have much […] Read more
Comments
Categorical Disagreement: Commission scolaire de Laval v. Syndicat de l’enseignement de la région de Laval, 2016 SCC 8
Even in the good old days when judicial review of administrative action was organized around readily identifiable poles such as “judicial” and “administrative” decisions, lawyers engaged in all manner of “verbal gymnastics” to contort their cases into a more favourable category (SA de Smith, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 1st ed., 1961). In an administrative […] Read more
Comments
Striking a Balance between Legal Centralism and Legal Pluralism
Before Christmas, I posted some thoughts on s. 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (see e.g. here and here). I have just finished revising my paper, which will appear in an edited collection about which I hope to say more soon. Here is the additional material I inserted in the last section, about how Canadian […] Read more
Comments Videos
“Prescribing Surveillance by Law” (In 2 Words – Law+Tech)
Here is the video from the event I wrote about. My witty introductory remarks unfortunately fell to the cutting room floor, but you can watch the substance of my presentation. Links to the other contributions are available on the L.R. Wilson website. Read more
Comments
Prescribing Surveillance by Law
Tomorrow I am speaking at the first in a series of conferences — En 2 mots / In 2 Words — organized by my colleague Vincent Gautrais. My topic is “Prescribing Surveillance by Law”. Here is the abstract I prepared: The common law of judicial review of administrative action has treated broad discretionary powers in […] Read more
Comments
Bias and Statistical Evidence: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30
There is a new decision from the Full Federal Court of Australia on whether and how statistical evidence can be used to demonstrate bias (in particular, prejudgement of relevant issues): ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30. Readers will recall that this question has also been raised in Canada (unsuccessfully) and […] Read more