Comments | Page 75
Comments
The Brexit Litigation: Statutory Interpretation and the Prerogative
As is well known, the people of Britain voted to leave the European Union on June 23. Quite how that vote will shape Britain’s future relationship with the EU remains unpredictable. One important factor is whether and when Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union will be triggered. There has been a flood […] Read more
Comments
Some Thoughts on Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2016 SCC 29
There are several points of general interest raised by the Supreme Court of Canada’s most recent administrative law decision, Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2016 SCC 29. By majority, the Court reversed the Federal Court of Appeal (see my post). For a discussion of the merits — in which the Court restored what labour […] Read more
Comments
Explaining Numbers: Two Recent Cases
Apologies again for the long silence. Things remain rather chaotic, as we find ourselves between Canada and Cambridge, a move made all the more difficult by Brexit, and I have several writing commitments which have been filling my limited free time. These are now much closer to being fulfilled (or, at least, the deadlines are […] Read more
Comments
Internally Appealing: Recent Canadian Cases on Internal Administrative Appeals
Regular readers will know that I have been following very closely the Canadian case law on internal administrative appeals. Three recent decisions, two from the Federal Court of Appeal on the Refugee Appeal Decision (the body that first prompted my interest in the subject) and one from the Prince Edward Island Court of Appeal (h/t […] Read more
Comments
Guest Post, Sébastien Grammond: Can Parliament enact a requirement that Supreme Court judges be bilingual?
One could be forgiven for thinking that the Supreme Court settled this question definitively in the following quote from the Reference re Supreme Court Act : Both the general eligibility requirements for appointment and the specific eligibility requirements for appointment from Quebec are aspects of the composition of the Court. It follows that any substantive change […] Read more
Comments
The Copyright Board of Canada: Which Way Ahead? Wednesday, May 25 (Ottawa)
At the behest of Canadian Heritage and Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, I have authored a report, Best Practices in Administrative Decision-Making: Viewing the Copyright Board of Canada in a Comparative Light, with a viewing to contributing to the 2017 five-year legislative review of Canada’s Copyright Act. Download it here. Here is the abstract: […] Read more
Comments
Doctoring Statistics: C.S.B -v- The Minister for Social Protection, [2016] IECA 116
I have posted before on unsuccessful efforts, in Australia and Canada, to invoke statistical evidence in order to demonstrate bias on the part of an administrative decision-maker. In the Australian and Canadian scenarios, the claims of bias were based on evidence showing that immigration officials invariably rejected asylum applications. An interesting recent Irish case, C.S.B […] Read more
Comments
New Job: University of Cambridge
I am really delighted to say that from October 1, I will be a Senior Lecturer in Public Law at the University of Cambridge. I have been hired to teach administrative law; the position opened up because of the impending retirement (from his university position only) of Professor Christopher Forsyth. There are very few places […] Read more
Comments
Procedure, Substance, Deference: Netflix, Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2015 FCA 289
Netflix, Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2015 FCA 289 is a useful illustration of some of the problems caused by judicial intervention on an intrusive standard on procedural matters. At issue was a tariff certified by the Copyright Board that imposed a monthly minimal fee for free trial periods […] Read more
Comments
Some More Thoughts on the TWU Litigation
I have been following, via Trinity Western University School of Law’s invaluable Twitter feed, proceedings at the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal: I posted on the first-instance decision here. The questions from the bench on Day One did not augur particularly well for the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, but the judges have also probed the […] Read more