Administrative Law Matters
Commentary on developments in administrative law, particularly judicial review of administrative action by common law courts.
Comments
Ideology and Administrative Law
Paul Daly August 31, 2015
Now that all the fuss about his past life as a blogger has died down, it is safe to venture a few comments about Justice Russell Brown’s appointment to the Supreme Court. He replaces Rothstein J., who retires today, leaving a very large gap in the Court’s administrative law and economic regulation expertise. Brown J. […] Read more
Comments
The Language of Administrative Law II: Mission Statements
Paul Daly August 28, 2015
(For the first post in this series, see here). The draft can be downloaded in its entirety here. Perhaps the most attractive – though also the most facile – endeavour for those who think deeply about administrative law is to formulate a general principle that unifies disparate strands of case-law. This then functions as a […] Read more
Comments
Cheryl Saunders on the Crown
Paul Daly August 26, 2015
Readers may be interested in Cheryl Saunders, “The Concept of the Crown“: This article deals with the weight that is borne by the concept of the Crown in the public law of common law jurisdictions in the absence of a developed theory of the state. I argue that the concept of the Crown has evolved […] Read more
Comments
The Language of Administrative Law: Introduction
Paul Daly August 20, 2015
In late October, I will be presenting a paper at a conference organized by the Canadian Bar Association in honour of former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Louis LeBel. I have spent the last couple of weeks working on a draft and will share it with readers in a series of posts. In this post, […] Read more
Comments
What’s in a Name? Procedural Fairness in Government Contracting: Canadian Arab Federation v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FCA 168
Paul Daly August 19, 2015
I posted about the first-instance decision in Canadian Arab Federation v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FCA 168 a while ago. Here, the Minister refused to enter into a new agreement with the Federation because of what he perceived as anti-semitic comments by one of its representatives. My particular interest is in the procedural fairness […] Read more
Comments
Pornography in Prisons: Naraine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 934
Paul Daly August 17, 2015
Naraine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 934 recently provoked the breathless — and breathtakingly misleading — headline: “Prison can’t take porn channels away from inmates, federal court rules“. The trigger for the Naraine litigation was apparently a parliamentary hearing on sexual harassment in the federal workplace before the Standing Committee on the Status of […] Read more
Comments
Two ‘Carltona’ Cases: W.T. v. Minister for Justice, [2015] IESC 73; R. (Bourgass) v. Secretary of State for Justice, [2015] UKSC 54
Paul Daly August 13, 2015
As has often been said by administrative lawyers waiting at bus-stops, you wait ages for a major case on the exercise of ministerial powers by subordinates and then two come along at once. There is an excellent review of the general principles in MacMenamin J.’s judgment for the Irish Supreme Court in W.T. v. Minister […] Read more
Comments
Help from Loyal Readers?
Paul Daly August 12, 2015
Legal blogging remains a poor cousin to other forms of academic writing. Times are beginning to change, especially with the increased recognition of the concept of academic ‘impact’, something social scientists are becoming more and more adept at measuring. Yet there are modest steps that online communities can take to increase the academic recognition of […] Read more
Comments
Why Call it CUPE?
Paul Daly August 11, 2015
A rant from a footnote in a paper I am working on, discussing amongst other things Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, [2003] 3 SCR 77: Hereafter “CUPE (2003)”. I call it CUPE (2003) to distinguish it from C.U.P.E. v. New Brunswick Liquor Corporation, [1979] 2 SCR 227, which is generally referred to as “CUPE”. […] Read more
Comments
A Supreme Court’s Place in the Constitutional Order – Contrasting Recent Experiences in Canada and the United Kingdom
Though it is slightly different from the usual fare I serve up here readers may be interested to know that I have a paper in a forthcoming volume of the Queen’s Law Journal on constitutional change. My contribution focuses on recent developments in Canada and the United Kingdom, the main common theme being the narratives […] Read more